AIVerify Asia
A source is useful only when readers can see which part of a review it supports and where its authority ends. This policy explains how references and corrections are handled.
Guides favor government publications, standards bodies, regulators, and primary technical documentation. A public framework can define a control or review boundary. It cannot confirm a supplier's identity, bank account, certificate, shipment, or product claim.
Each source note should identify the rule, control, or failure mode it supports. Broad framework links are not treated as proof for a transaction. The buyer still needs the original supplier record and a dated review note.
Publication dates, version numbers, and access dates matter when a rule or technical recommendation changes. A guide receives a new modified date only after its substantive text, source interpretation, or review procedure changes.
Material corrections appear in the update log. A correction may replace a stale link, narrow an unsupported statement, or revise a workflow after new official guidance. Styling and deployment changes do not refresh article dates.
The library does not certify suppliers, clear payments, issue sanctions conclusions, or replace advice from a lawyer, bank, laboratory, customs broker, or regulator. Readers remain responsible for the decision attached to a live case file.
Use the source lists as starting points for a supplier file. If a page helps you identify a gap, keep the page URL, the source links, and your supplier documents together in the same decision record.